If you are looking for specific information about today’s Full Page Washington Post Advertisement click here. X
The more open a system becomes, the more easily it can be penetrated by money, lobbyists and fanatics...Congress can now be monitored and influenced as never before. As a result, lobbies, which do most of the monitoring and influencing, have gained power.
Fareed Zakaria 2003 – Future of Freedom
January 31, 2018

Washington Post Ad

On January 31st, CRI placed a display ad in the Washington Post. The claims in the ad are based on our four-year study which finds that congressional transparency overwhelmingly benefits the powerful and drives increasing inequality, partisanship, incarceration etc. This is a topic we have found broad support for in the literature.

CRI Washington Post Ad 2018

As such, our ad is targeted and addressed to a number of, likely, well-intentioned individuals and groups, who continue to advocate for harmful forms of government transparency. Clicking on their names below reveals a number of their enthusiastically pro-transparency statements. We have debunk Norm Eisen’s work here, and maintain a page on Lee Drutman here.

Joseph Stiglitz Elizbeth Warren Sunlight Foundation Represent.Us Norm Eisen Lee Drutman

{{DangerousTitle}} Joseph Stiglitz
{{DangerousTitle}} Elizabeth Warren
{{DangerousTitle}} The Sunlight Foundation
{{DangerousTitle}} Represent.Us
{{DangerousTitle}} Norm Eisen
{{DangerousTitle}} Lee Drutman

< Show Washington Post Ad >

In the ad we feature a number of citations from celebrated scholars and politicos on the dangers of transparency. Click here to access those citations as well as hundreds more.

Note: Readers often confuse the various forms of transparency discussed frequently in the press. Congressional transparency is unlike corporate transparency, lobbying transparency or any transparency measures that might be applied to actors in the private sector. Our work does not address issues with private sector transparency (say a charity declaring how it distributes its benefits). Further, we clearly have no objection to the publication of the outcomes of deliberation, i.e. final, ratified laws etc. Our concern is with ‘process transparency’, which is the type of transparency that was introduced broadly in the in the early 1970s via the Legislative Reorganization Act and other reforms. This critical and sensitive form of transparency concerns the actions of governing bodies as they draft, debate, amend, mark-up and vote on amendments, proposals and legislation.